I am a pre-junior in the Film and Video program here at Drexel University, who spends far too many hours in the editing labs. This is the first course I have taken which uses the technology we have available on the internet to this extent.
I come from a family with very decided political opinions -- not necessarily in harmony with either of the prevailing Republican or Democratic parties. I believe that you should vote for the best person for the job regardless of race or gender. However, in my opinion, this upcoming election doesn't offer any promising candidates.
Choose 08...intro...
They always say, "this is the most important blah blah of our time."
Well maybe it is, and maybe it isn't. But this team of Drexel University students will get into it summer of 2008 (while we're not at the beach, or soaking up the free AC at the library)...
Get into IT.
Into the nooks and crannies, the issues the media has forgotten because a cat got stuck in a tree, or a congressman was caught with his pants down.
Issues not invective.
20 something voices start June 24th.
Well maybe it is, and maybe it isn't. But this team of Drexel University students will get into it summer of 2008 (while we're not at the beach, or soaking up the free AC at the library)...
Get into IT.
Into the nooks and crannies, the issues the media has forgotten because a cat got stuck in a tree, or a congressman was caught with his pants down.
Issues not invective.
20 something voices start June 24th.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
How would you define a promising candidate? If I were to turn the several possibilities into a multiple choice test question, that reflect my definition of the ideal candidate... well I think you can see where I stand.
A) Taking the things said during the campaign period and actually implementing them post-election?
B) Saying what needs to be said in order to gain popularity?
C) Taking the things said during the campaign period and actually implementing them post-election?
D) Taking the things said during the campaign period and actually implementing them post-election?
I think I've made it obvious enough, perhaps not which letter I'd go with, but rather which concept I'd select. Too bad it's only a concept though. And although it may seem like we could make history with the winner of the upcoming election... I'm not sure if making history is as important as creating a stable country - the "silent promise" that all [unpromising] candidates seem to share.
There is a saying that goes something like: Actions speak louder than words. Following that saying, I question how we are to base our decision - a major and potentially revolutionary decision, on the mere words of the candidates. Rarely do we hear the truth from any of the candidates: You know America, I can't really do that.
We really don't know how they will serve as leaders... especially based off some of their radical ideas of change. Change is something that is a slow process, and requires the consent of a group in its entirety in order to be a successful change. And as a democratic nation, with two rival parties... how would we ever receive the consent of the entire nation?
It seems like we are putting a lot more 'Hope' in some of the candidates than trust and accountability. And for these reasons, I agree with you when you say that "...this upcoming election doesn't offer any promising candidates."
Post a Comment